Look at
all those synonyms for "bright". The problem is not just that not
everyone may make the connection between "auroral" and the Northern
Lights and then know that it means "bright". There is also the issue
that a synonym only has a similar meaning, not an identical meaning. According
to the dictionary,
"Glisten, shimmer, sparkle refer to different ways in which
light is reflected from surfaces. Glisten refers to a lustrous light, as from
something sleek or wet, or it may refer to myriads of tiny gleams reflected
from small surfaces: Wet fur glistens. Snow glistens in the sunlight. Shimmer
refers to the changing play of light on a (generally moving) surface, as of
water or silk: Moonbeams shimmer on water. Silk shimmers in a high light. To
sparkle is to give off sparks or small ignited particles, or to send forth
small but brilliant gleams, sometimes by reflection: A diamond sparkles with
numerous points of light."
Glistening,
shimmering, and sparkling are all synonyms, but they have slightly different
meanings.
Dictionary.com has many more lists like these, explaining the subtle differences between
synonyms. Just look a word up.
These
differences also apply to colors, for example, eye colors.
Over the
course of a story, a character's eyes might be described as cerulean, then
cobalt, then azure, then sapphire, and then simply blue. What is the problem
with this?
Cerulean,
cobalt, azure, sapphire, and blue are not the same color. They are different
shades of blue. If someone's eyes are being described as all those colors, they
need to see a doctor.
This is cerulean.
This is cobalt.
This is azure.
This is sapphire.
This is blue.
Also,
anyone using the phrase "emerald eyes" should know that this is emerald. It looks nothing
like this.
Now, let's
look at these two sentences.
1. The
colossal structure reared high into the turbid sky.
2. The
enormous building reached high into the stormy sky.
The first
one uses the most "fancy" words, and in truth, does sound better. It
sounds more poetic and less juvenile. Just make sure you know what the words
mean.
Now look
at this.
I stared toward the scintillating surface of the rill as it
tumbled through the veldt into the coppice.
(Rough
Translation: I started toward the sparkling surface of the creek as it rushed
through the plain into the woods.)
Ugh. If I
had read that in a book, I'd have needed a dictionary to figure out what that
one sentence meant! I know that "rill" means a small creek, but
"veldt"? "Coppice"? No. I have no idea.
You might
think that using thesaurus words makes your work seem smarter. It does not. It
makes your work seem like it was written by someone trying desperately to seem
smart. It doesn't take an IQ of 140 to crack open a thesaurus.